GIF89a GIF89a Schools - Malfeasance https://www.malfeasance.io A Cautionary Tale from the Family Court System Wed, 17 Nov 2021 01:31:55 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 20191108_dinner.m4a https://www.malfeasance.io/document/20191108_dinner-m4a/ Sun, 08 Aug 2021 05:40:24 +0000 https://doc.bradpayne.org/?post_type=dlp_document&p=399 Phone Call 10/16/2020 https://www.malfeasance.io/moving/449/ Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:07:36 +0000 https://doc.bradpayne.org/?p=449 A phone call following Kim’s recent (same day) progression with her mortgage. Now that she had an additional level of borrowing approval, she gets bolder and makes demands about her plans to take the children to St. Paul. [[ AUDIO ]] Need to cut into clips – file is too big.

The post Phone Call 10/16/2020 first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> A phone call following Kim’s recent (same day) progression with her mortgage. Now that she had an additional level of borrowing approval, she gets bolder and makes demands about her plans to take the children to St. Paul.

[[ AUDIO ]] Need to cut into clips – file is too big.

The post Phone Call 10/16/2020 first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> Phone Calls RE: Custody on 9/14/2020 https://www.malfeasance.io/moving/537/ Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:41:03 +0000 https://doc.bradpayne.org/?p=537 In our weekly call regarding the children, Kim starts her campaign to break the 50/50 arrangement that we had been operating under. She employs the various manipulative tactics that are seen throughout our interactions. Audio Summary Start Time Kim starts “primary caregiver” argument 02:40 Schools, etc. Including recap of past conversations. 14:11 Related: Kim’s Request…

Read More

The post Phone Calls RE: Custody on 9/14/2020 first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> In our weekly call regarding the children, Kim starts her campaign to break the 50/50 arrangement that we had been operating under. She employs the various manipulative tactics that are seen throughout our interactions.

Audio Summary Start Time
Kim starts “primary caregiver” argument 02:40
Schools, etc. Including recap of past conversations. 14:11

Related:

 
Initial Call – Full  
Follow Up Call – Full  

Manipulative Tactics Used

  1. By this point, I had told Kim that all decisions relating to the future of the children needs to be handled through the lawyers. Not because I wanted to delay the process, not because I wanted to run up legal bills, but because I was aware of the lying and manipulation taking place, and that I could not effectively counter it in-realtime, and having no documentation of the agreements that were or were not made. Despite this, Kim tries to strong-arm me into saying something, or agreeing to something directly to her in a series of calls that were intended to be used for discussing the ongoing raising of the children. 
  2. She bombards the conversation with assertions that I don’t agree with. If I stop to argue each point, she will “blow up the conversation” saying that I’m simply argumentative, or not willing to work. If I don’t argue the suppositions that she makes, she keeps making the assertion over, and over again so as to make it seem as though it is reality.
  3. She talks over you, with rapid points that are blatantly false, while maintaining this “fragility” and making accusations of being “verbally abused” if you counter one of her points, putting words into my mouth that I didn’t say.

  4. She is very deliberate about which points she’s going to argue, because she’s been setting them up:

    1. “No reason to believe that I’m going to keep the kids away from you..” an off-shoot of the refrain that she used since the beginning of divorce talks. “I’d never do anything to limit the time the kids have with you, I’m worried that you’d do that to me, because YOU have the power in the court system…” while she had been plotting all along to do precisely that.
    2. “you go into the basement…” a point that she complained to during the implementation of our “in-house separation” that I was not isolating myself to the basement “enough”
    3. “We don’t communicate…” I had been pushing for over a year to work on the co-parenting relationship, in a post-divorce model. She refused to engage in that, going so far as to say that “trust is not required for co-parenting,” both in conversation and it writing. She argues back and forth on why she’s unwilling to follow the state-provided framework for communication.
    4. “You didn’t have room’s setup..” She intentionally gave me very little notice before moving out of the house, and despite her claims of needing to tell the children on a timeline, together, she started telling Rowan and the neighbors about her moving out before she brought it up with me.
  5. The points about being the primary caregiver was clearly the point that she needed to stress. When coupled with a manufactured urgency in needing to move, she believed the “primary caregiver” role would allow a decision for her to take the kids with her. Once established with her, this would be hard to change. So, she perjured herself relating to any detail in order to establish herself as the “primary caregiver:”
    1. Medical
      1. Oliver chipping his tooth, and she dropped him off at my house with swollen face
      2. Antibiotics
      3. Medical records of visits
    2. Selection of, and involvement in, the kids’ daycares
    3. Involvement with arranging babysitters
    4. Manipulated neighbors and others into providing testimony that they were not comfortable with. 
  6. Trying to say that I don’t have the capacity “because of my super-intense job”
    1. I have made offers to quit my job and stay home with the kids, Kim derails that conversation, stating that I HAVE to be the bread-winner for the family
    2. I told her, that “I would make things work,” because the kids are my priority. The past year has been a demonstration of that.
      1. I took off work from October to January to focus on this divorce.
      2. I moved to Minneapolis days after she was granted the rights to take them, jeopardizing my job stability.
      3. I have been working 1/2 time in order to deal with constant issues coming out of Kim having care of the kids (e.g. Newman, etc)
    3. I started a new job in 2019, as we were discussing getting a divorce, in order to possibly have more flexibility, as my prior job certainly did not. In my new job, I was in way over my head, and needed to “earn my spot” in a project, that ended on June 15th. I needed to deliver this project in order to keep demonstrate my ability to perform in this new role. Kim took full advantage of this, acting as though this initial vigorous schedule was a permanent thing. 
      1. I hadn’t worked more than 40hrs a week since having kids, until this job
      2. Even when working in Duluth and Alpharetta, I took the kids to, and picked the kids up from school
      3. I took days off of work to take the kids on field trip, participated in other school events. I have always had the flexibility and desire to do this on my own, absent divorce “in the air.”
      4. Kim has shown neither the ability, nor desire to participate in the kids’ schools, until divorce came into the conversation. And going through the financial records, it’s clear that A LOT of her behavior in 2019 is explained in hindsight because she was already strategizing on how to manipulate the divorce process

The post Phone Calls RE: Custody on 9/14/2020 first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> Conversations Following “Wellness Check” Text From Dr. James https://www.malfeasance.io/moving/360/ Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:28:41 +0000 https://doc.bradpayne.org/?p=360 Dr. James sends a “wellness check” text, which among other things asked that this “new narrative of abuse” not take hold before he had a chance to clinically diagnose it. I was taken aback by the mention of abuse, and asked Kim about it. After “assurances” that she had no idea what he was talking…

Read More

The post Conversations Following “Wellness Check” Text From Dr. James first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> Dr. James sends a “wellness check” text, which among other things asked that this “new narrative of abuse” not take hold before he had a chance to clinically diagnose it. I was taken aback by the mention of abuse, and asked Kim about it. After “assurances” that she had no idea what he was talking about, we had the first conversation outside of therapy in quite some time. I recorded it, because I had lost all trust in Kim months prior to this, and needed a record of what was said.

[[ IMG_TXT_MSG ]]

Moving to Alabama

Because we were in a cooperative place, and we didn’t discuss anything outside of Dr. James’ office, I ask Kim to elaborate on her plans for moving to Alabama that she had just sprung on me 3 days before in Dr. James’ office. Below is what she said:

Plan Details:

Priorities:

TODO:

  1. Dr. James’ txt message
  2. Audio of Kim denying abuse was mentioned in the 2014 therapy session

The post Conversations Following “Wellness Check” Text From Dr. James first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> Dinner with Minnesota Friends https://www.malfeasance.io/moving/380/ Sat, 09 Nov 2019 05:13:44 +0000 https://doc.bradpayne.org/?p=380 We had dinner with a couple from Minnesota who had been staying with us for the weekend. We discussed a number of things, including plans for moving back to Minnesota. Kim’s Comments on Schools in the Twin Cities: She says the schools in the Minneapolis and St. Paul, are “just shit.” When our friend says,…

Read More

The post Dinner with Minnesota Friends first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> We had dinner with a couple from Minnesota who had been staying with us for the weekend. We discussed a number of things, including plans for moving back to Minnesota.

Kim’s Comments on Schools in the Twin Cities:

She says the schools in the Minneapolis and St. Paul, are “just shit.”

When our friend says, “What about Wayzata?” She corrects him with “Minneapolis and St. Paul,” which goes to her “inside the city proper” mentality. Most people when referring to the Twin Cities, or Minneapolis/St. Paul in this kind of context would assume the metro…her somewhat curt correction may only be perceivable by people familiar with Kim’s opinion, and to them, this is an eye-rolling distinction. I am still not totally certain what the basis for this “inside city limits” is all about, but it’s definitely not just “city-living,” as that’s a distinction without a difference for many areas, including ones Kim found reasonable inside the city, but not outside. She also has a rejection of seemingly all-things “middle-class,”  anything that would be associated with being white/caucasian, and generally anything male. White, middle-class, male is the devil in her eyes and she made no qualms about pre-judging people who fit this description before meeting them, and then treating them with utter disdain, including eventually my brother and father both (as well as me, obviously).

 

Brad’s Comments on Schools in Twin Cities:

Kim not Wanting to Live Somewhere Where Lives Revolve Around Kids:

Why We’re Planning on Moving Back:

 

Related:

  • Discussion of her head trauma at this same dinner.
  • We can get the kids in somewhere in talking about moving to Alabama a few months later …on Feb. 17th 2020
  • [[ LINK ]] Kim insists that the kids can only go to Newman during first discussion of it (to support her move to St. Paul as isolation from me).

The post Dinner with Minnesota Friends first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> Outline of My Concerns with Kim’s Personality and Parenting https://www.malfeasance.io/schools/313/ Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:13:22 +0000 https://doc.bradpayne.org/?p=313 By October 2019, Kim and I had made the decisions to “de-couple.” Until this point, I had to “hold back” my objections to Kim as a parent (or as a partner), because she had made it perfectly clear that she was willing to let a little spat escalate into a justifiable reason to breakup a…

Read More

The post Outline of My Concerns with Kim’s Personality and Parenting first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]> By October 2019, Kim and I had made the decisions to “de-couple.” Until this point, I had to “hold back” my objections to Kim as a parent (or as a partner), because she had made it perfectly clear that she was willing to let a little spat escalate into a justifiable reason to breakup a household with two small children. I had conceded that I wouldn’t be happy with her as a partner, but was not going to personally allow “silly” arguments be the cause of a broken home for my two kids.

Below is an email to Dr. James that outlined some of my concerns with Kim as a parent, as a partner, and just as a decent person.  I called out the use of profanity as a concern around the children, something that I had brought up a number of times. Just days later, that documented concern would come to a head when our 3yr old daughter corrected me to say “What the Fuck?” instead of “What in the world?”

Alternative text – include a link Link to PDF 

I came to this decision that de-coupling was necessary after Kim absconded with the proceeds from the sale of 399 Curtice, and immediately tried to argue that she was completely justified in doing so, I realized that even if I was willing to concede every little mole hill of an argument with her, I would never, ever, trust her in any way again. She had numerous financial improprieties in the past, but she played both sides of the issue so as to not be addressed:

  1. “I don’t understand finances, because nobody ever taught me, because no one in my family ever had any money” – even though she was 43yrs old and could have/should have taken this upon herself by this time.
  2. “You’re not my dad, don’t treat me like I’m a child by trying to get involved with how I spend my money!” This is what she would say when I tried to get involved in getting a handle on the household finances and understand where her income was going.

With 399 Curtice, she didn’t even feign to offer an excuse; she just said it was “her house,” and she could do whatever she wanted with the money.  The history of 399 Curtice, is a story of its own, but suffice it to say that I unquestionably put more time, money, and labor into that house than she did. This made me realize what she was capable of, and that she would likely never regain my trust, at least sufficient for a healthy relationship. She either never attempted to – even when it was explicitly stated for the benefit of the children in building some kind of working co-parenting relationship. 

I learned a few things over those last months of 2019:

  1. That she cannot be given the benefit of the doubt that she’s not lying straight to your face…about anything
  2. If you simply politely press Kim to clarify a “story” that she’s telling you when it doesn’t make sense, you don’t get very far until you run into one of her avoidance tactics. I had not pressed her much in the past (prior to kids), because there weren’t many issues that were worth fighting over.  Upon having kids, I had positions that I at least wanted to understand the rationale to the opposing position. She would consistently stand her ground, without giving any kind of explanation for the position, and continued this underlying “well, I’ll just leave if I’m not happy (getting her way).”
  3. Kim has a very deliberate and identifiable strategy once you’ve seen the pattern:
    1. She uses what would be a virtue as an exploit for her avoidance tactic for something that she’s doing or planning to do, and sets it up well in advance.
      • e.g. “You’re calling me stupid!” seemingly out of the blue. When I adamantly object to that accusation, she’d use anything like a sigh or a questioning look to be the same thing.
      • Other examples that started with divorce: “You’re calling me a gold-digger,” “I would never do anything to limit/restrict your time with kids – I’m afraid you will,” “Are you seriously going to drag this family to court (rather than conceding moving to Alabama)? I can’t believe you would stoop to that..”
    2. As she has you on egg shells to not make her think that “you’re calling her stupid,” she’d use absurd rationales for her arguments.
      • e.g. She objected to me “spending the money” to put the children on the waiting list for a feeder daycare into the charter school right by our house, in only a few back-and-forths, I shouldn’t spend the $100 admin fee because, “we don’t even know if the kids will want to go to college, so won’t need to go to a good school.” (I later found out the real reason to this example – she wanted to use “bad schools” as part of her justification for the urgent departure with the kids, and that only she was the parent who arranged schools).

 

 

TODO:

  1. Add links to posts, where indicated in the red text.

The post Outline of My Concerns with Kim’s Personality and Parenting first appeared on Malfeasance.

]]>